20/09/2025
Current affairs. For all the chat across all the networks and internet, I’ve never heard anyone suggest that, perhaps, Russia has formed a pact with China, N.Korea (or others like India), to surprise the West by either jointly ‘causing military mischief’ or, worse, somehow conspiring to surprise either Nato, Taiwan or the United States (or individual European countries like the UK), in actually starting a war they believe they could win if working together. (Either by China / Russia hitting the West’s command structure with hyper weapons or maybe by splitting Nato and the US, (already fractured), by China invading Taiwan while Russia invades Europe. Your thoughts?
ChatGPT said:
Your question taps into a very real and growing concern among geopolitical analysts and military strategists: the possibility of coordinated action by authoritarian states—particularly Russia, China, and North Korea—to challenge or even strike the West in a synchronized manner.
Let’s unpack it carefully and realistically:
🔹 Is there an actual pact between Russia, China, and North Korea?
There’s no publicly declared or formal military alliance between these countries like NATO, but there are signs of increasing strategic alignment:
- Russia-China: The most significant and mature axis. Joint military exercises, energy cooperation, diplomatic coordination at the UN, and shared opposition to the U.S.-led world order. While not a formal alliance, they’ve described their relationship as “no limits.”
- Russia–North Korea: Relations have warmed significantly, especially in 2023–2024. Russia is reportedly receiving munitions from North Korea for its war in Ukraine. In return, it may be offering satellite or missile tech—red lines for the U.S. and Japan.
- China–North Korea: This is a long-standing but cautious relationship. China doesn’t control Kim Jong-un, but it shields North Korea diplomatically and economically because it values stability and a buffer against U.S. troops in South Korea.
- India: It’s not aligned with this group. While it buys Russian weapons and oil, India is increasingly wary of China, particularly after deadly border clashes in the Himalayas. India is closer to the U.S., Japan, and Australia through the Quad alliance.
So: No formal axis, but a kind of loose anti-Western bloc is emerging—an “axis of convenience,” not of deep trust.
🔹 Could they coordinate military actions to surprise the West?
In theory? Yes.
In practice? Highly risky, but not impossible.
Scenario 1: China invades Taiwan; Russia escalates in Europe.
This is the most frequently discussed “double-front” strategy.
- The West’s attention and resources would be divided.
- NATO would struggle to supply Ukraine and respond to a Taiwan crisis.
- It could test U.S. resolve and force strategic overstretch.
Scenario 2: Cyber or hypersonic first strike on command & control infrastructure.
This is what keeps some generals and analysts up at night: A “bolt from the blue” attack—especially using hypersonic missiles, anti-satellite weapons, or electromagnetic pulse (EMP) tools to blind the U.S. and NATO.
But pulling that off requires incredible coordination, real-time intelligence, decisive military superiority, and certainty of political resolve—none of which currently favor Russia or China.
🔹 Why haven’t we heard more open discussion of this possibility?
Several reasons:
- Strategic ambiguity and plausible deniability: These countries prefer to suggest alignment without formally stating it. It’s part of grey-zone warfare.
- Mainstream media caution: Speculation about global war scenarios can be seen as alarmist without hard evidence.
- Intelligence assessments may not be public: It’s possible that behind closed doors, Western intelligence agencies are modeling these exact scenarios.
🔹 How realistic is this threat—really?
It’s plausible, but not probable—at least not yet. Here’s why:
- Russia is tied down in Ukraine. Its forces are depleted. It cannot easily open a second front in Europe right now.
- China is cautious. Xi Jinping talks tough but remains economically tied to the West. An invasion of Taiwan would be enormously risky—and the PLA may not yet be ready.
- The West is still powerful. NATO remains cohesive enough (despite political tensions), and the U.S. military is still dominant globally.
- Escalation = nuclear risk. These countries may talk big, but full-scale war with the West could quickly go nuclear. They know this.
That said, the longer the West is divided internally, and the more these powers test and succeed in grey-zone tactics (cyber attacks, misinformation, proxy wars), the more emboldened they may become.
🧠 Bottom Line
You’re not paranoid or crazy for thinking this through. You’re asking a question that should be debated more openly:
- Could there be an informal, opportunistic pact among authoritarian powers to challenge the West militarily? Yes.
- Are they currently planning a coordinated surprise war? There’s no public evidence—but the risk is non-zero and growing.
We’re living in a pre-multipolar world, and history teaches us that rising powers—especially those who feel cornered—can lash out together in surprising ways.
Watch the signals, not just the statements. Military exercises, trade patterns, diplomatic visits, cyber activity, and propaganda are the smoke—war is the fire that could follow.
If you’re interested, I can show you specific military exercises, recent joint statements, or even war-game scenarios that explore how this might unfold.
About the Author
